Showing posts with label Genderal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Genderal. Show all posts

Thursday, 9 August 2012

Ultra-Orthodox Men Now Wearing Special Blinders to Avoid Seeing Sexy Things [Genderal Interest]

Ultra-Orthodox Men Now Wearing Special Blinders to Avoid Seeing Sexy ThingsFeeling tempted by scantily-dressed women on the bus, or sexy billboards by the side of the road? If you're an ultra-Orthodox man in Israel, you're in luck: you can now buy special blinders to prevent sin-enticing images from sneaking into your peripheral vision. As the Times of Israel reported yesterday, an organization called The Committee for Purity in the Camp is selling special stickers that the observant-but-easily-vulnerable-to-lady-business can wear on their eyeglasses. The stickers "blur vision of anything beyond the range of a few meters and so diffuse immodestly dressed women to a harmless blot." (If you don't wear glasses, the Purity Committee sells a non-prescription pair with stickers for the soul-saving bargain price of around $32.)

On the one hand, this is good news. As the Times notes, these eyeglasses mark a "change in tactics" in the Israeli ultra-Orthodox campaign against immodesty. Rather than forcing women to cover up (and spitting on eight year-olds with exposed forearms), these blinders place the onus for avoiding temptation where it belongs: on men. If the choice is between harassing women for displaying bare skin and turning men into carriage horses, the latter seems like the preferable option.

At the same time, these eyeglasses and their stickers send two toxic and unmistakable messages. First, women's bodies have such power to do harm that men need to partially blind themselves for protection. Second, men are totally incapable of exercising self-control. In the book of Job (Iyov in Hebrew) the title character says "I have made a covenant with my eyes; how then should I look lustfully at a girl?" A covenant is a promise sustained by faith, not by a crude device that impairs the senses. Deeply religious men usually have the ocular muscles to redirect their vision from that which might prove a solicitation to sin. Outsourcing that willpower to a pair of glasses makes the idea of self-control almost meaningless.

A pair of glasses that reduce rather than enhance vision is quite a novelty. And while these specs and stickers reinforce the myth that men are hopelessly weak, if we're forced into the false dichotomy between shaming women and blinding men, we might as well pick the latter.

Anti-Ogle Goggles for the Modest Set [Times of Israel]


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Saturday, 4 August 2012

Why Do Some Dudes Assume All Their Female Friends Want to Bang Them? [Genderal Interest]

Why Do Some Dudes Assume All Their Female Friends Want to Bang Them?Of course men and women can be friends. In 2012, the claim that sex will always get in the way comes across as antiquated and essentialist; our hopes and our ideological convictions about gender leave us believing that platonic friendship between guys and gals is — absolutely — possible. But while our lived experience tells us that men and women can be friends, recent research suggests that these relationships are neither as common nor as easy to find as most of us would like. Based on recent research, the question we need to start asking isn't "can men and women be friends" but rather "how can we better equip dudes to handle non-sexual friendship with the ladies?"

As Doug Barry discussed previously, a new study suggests the obvious: men are the ones who have the harder time with boundaries in opposite-sex friendships. In Benefit or Burden: Attraction in Cross-Sex Friendship, April Bleske-Rechek and her team of researchers found that men are much more likely to be sexually attracted to their female friends than vice-versa. Both men and women reported that desire was a "cost more often than a benefit," with the sad potential to bring "potential negative consequences for individuals' long-term mateships."

One problem with the study shows up in the first sentence of the abstract which declares that "cross-sex friendships are an historically recent phenomenon." That's not entirely true. As Jodi Bilinkoff argued in her landmark 2005 study, medieval Catholic priests and wealthy female penitents often developed nonsexual "deep friendships" around the sacrament of confession. Theologian Dan Brennan has documented a long history of cross-sex friendship in the church in Sacred Unions, Sacred Passions: Engaging the Mystery of Friendship Between Men and Women. Simply put, it's a massive over-simplification to suggest that friendships between men and women were unheard of until our modern world. (As an aside, it's worth noting that lead investigator Bleske-Rechek once compared trusting a romantic partner's platonic friendship to the risks of letting "your teenage daughter go to a concert dressed like a slut.")

Whatever the study's shortcomings, it does seem to bear out that Harry was at least partly right when he told Sally that sex would always get in the way of male-female friendship. But as the study itself makes clear, the problem that destroys friendship isn't the physiological reality of sexual attraction, but rather the inability (or refusal) of so many straight men to believe that their female buddies aren't secretly crushing on them. In other words, the problem isn't that guys are totally overwhelmed by the hornies whenever they get in close proximity to a female friend. The problem is that men misunderstand women's intentions for wanting friendship, falsely assuming that ladies only want "one thing."

FMK is a fun meme. If you're not familiar, it involves taking 3 or more dudes (like the Romney sons or the Game of Thrones cast) and deciding which one you'd most like to fuck, which one you'd be most likely to marry, and which one you'd most want to kill. These debates are great for procrastinators, but no one here seriously believes that the longings to "fuck," "marry," and "kill" constitute the sum total of women's desires. The problem (and the blame certainly doesn't fall on the FMK meme) is that a great many men do labor under the delusion that women have no interest in being "just friends" with guys. If you're smiling at me over coffee, you must want to fuck me and have my babies –- or so more than a few dudes conclude. For them, FMK isn't a joke, but a plausibly accurate reflection of women's chief feelings about men.

The problem isn't just, as the Bleske-Rechek study shows, that men wildly overestimate their female buddies' sexual interest. It's that they also undervalue their own worth as friends. In a world where we still cling to the belief that women are naturally more intuitive and verbally adept than men, many guys assume that if a woman wants a non-sexual friendship, she'll naturally choose from the ranks of those who "do" friendship well: other women. The idea that a straight woman might want to be close to them without wanting to fuck or marry strikes them as utterly implausible. As a result, men do two things at once: they overrate their own sexual irresistibility and depreciate everything else they might have to offer. Little wonder, then, that so many dudes wrongly assume that their lady friends are crushing on them.

So what can we do to better equip guys to be "just friends" with the women in their lives? For starters, we can debunk once and for all the myth that sexual desire makes friendship impossible. The traditional reasoning is that male-female platonic relationships only work when neither friend is ever attracted to the other. Given how fluid and surprising desire can be, those friendships where lust never appears for even an instant are going to be relatively rare. But this reasoning overstates the power of sexual attraction to drown out everything else. As this new study makes clear, it's not that women are never attracted to their male buddies. It's that women are probably better acculturated to put lust aside for the sake of a friendship.

As Juliet Lapidos wrote at Slate, a close examination of the existing research shows that "sexual feeling within friendship exists on a Kinsey-type scale, and moderate attraction does not necessarily ruin or invalidate the relationship." While it's difficult to quantify "moderate attraction" in a universally applicable way, it's fair to assume that the occasional fantasy about wanting to bone your buddy doesn't mean that your friendship is founded on a lie. No one's sex drive –- not even young men's –- is so powerful that it must always trump any possibility of enduring friendship.

In the long run, what will most help adult cross-sex friendships to thrive is a culture that encourages children and teens to develop close and enduring platonic bonds. In Guyland: The Perilous World Where Boys Become Men sociologist Michael Kimmel offers compelling evidence that boys who grow up with close female friends are demonstrably less likely to engage in destructive behavior. Friendships with girls not only provide young boys with a kind of inoculation against sexist cruelty, they set boys up to see their female peers as complete human beings. Alas, too many adults undermine cross-sex children's cross-sex friendships, often by asking little Joey teasingly if little Emma is his "girlfriend."

The more we encourage non-romantic, non-sexualized relationships between boys and girls, the better we equip kids to have great platonic friendships as adults. Guys who grow up with girl buddies are less likely to assume that an eagerness to spend time together is proof of a secret crush. Boys who grow up liking and being liked by girls will almost certainly be better prepared to handle the inevitable ambiguities that come with any relationship. And presumably, they'll be a lot less inclined to imagine that their female friends just want to fuck -– or marry –- them.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Monday, 30 July 2012

How a Woman's Orgasm Can Save a Man [Genderal Interest]

How a Woman's Orgasm Can Save a ManCan teaching guys how to give women orgasms prevent the much-heralded "end of men"? As far-fetched as it sounds, one rapidly growing organization claims that equipping men to make women come is the solution to the much-vaunted masculinity crisis.

"Learn Orgasmic Meditation and everything that goes with it," urges the website for One Taste, a San Francisco-based organization that promises to help women move beyond the pursuit of a quick climax and into the realm of the 15-minute orgasm. From its humble beginnings as a San Francisco commune, One Taste has blossomed into a successful national movement teaching Orgasmic Meditation (OM) classes across the country, from San Diego to New York. That isn't the only kind of growth One Taste has been experiencing. Though a 2009 New York Times article noted the group's "near-exclusive focus on female pleasure," founder Nicole Daedone and her team of instructors are increasingly emphasizing what OM has to offer men.

The basic technique of OM hasn't changed in recent years: a "stroker" caresses what Daedone claims is a woman's most sensitive spot, the upper-left quadrant of the clitoris. The "stroker" (almost always a man) is fully clothed; the woman being stroked is only naked from the waist down. The traditional practice lasts 15 minutes; rather than producing a single sharp climax, an OM is an extended orgasm that may or may not have a distinct peak. When Salon's sex writer Tracy Clark-Flory observed a public OM session, she found it "arousing and deeply bizarre."

Men stroke; women are stroked. (While women can stroke women –- Daedone herself often demonstrates OM technique –- there are relatively few lesbian couples active in One Taste.) As Daedone explains it, this lack of reciprocity is rooted in a basic difference between male and female sexuality. "The great modern invention that helps women orgasm is the vibrator," Daedone says in an interview; "the great invention that helps men is porn." (She acknowledges that some men use vibrators and some women like looking at porn.) Women experience the most intense pleasure from direct clitoral stimulation, she argues, while "men are most aroused by watching images of other human beings orgasming." OM is more equally balanced than first appears, Daedone says. She claims that an experienced male stroker can receive every bit as much ecstasy from OM as the woman whose clitoris he's caressing.

But the real payoff of OM for a man goes beyond his delight in watching a woman orgasm beneath his fingertip. What OM offers, Daedone claims, is an opportunity for guys to break the familiar, depressing cycle of oscillating "between bravado and helplessness." OM gives men a sense of mastery, not just of women's bodies, but of themselves. If it's true that there's nothing straight men want to know more than to how to please a woman, then it follows that if they figure out how to do that well and consistently, they'll receive a boost of confidence that will bleed over into every other aspect of their lives.

Ken Blackman, a 48 year-old former Apple software engineer who is now One Taste's "senior stroker," told me that One Taste had transformed his life. He came to the OM practice as a self-described "short nerd" who was desperate to learn tips for becoming great in bed. What he found instead was a whole new way of relating to women and to himself. According to Blackman, becoming a great stroker (Daedone praises him as among the very best she's taught) has little to do with technique and more to do with cultivating "a talent for play." "Women want men who have a demonstrated capacity for handling the truth," he says; "OM teaches guys how not to be intimidated by the full intensity of women's hunger."

Pick-up artists often promise male clients the same thing: insight into "what women really want" as well as an injection of much-needed confidence. When I ask Blackman about the comparison between OM and the purveyors of "game," he acknowledges the similarity but suggests One Taste offers a more collaborative view of heterosexual relations. "Pick-up artists turn women into a formula: ‘say this line and she'll go to bed with you.' OM gives guys a compass for how to interact with women as equals."

In January, Daedone set the tone for One Taste's new focus on guys by publishing an 1800-word "apology to men" on her website. The lengthy letter reflects Daedone's equally staunch essentialism (she believes men and women are naturally very, very different) and feminism (she comes from a gender studies background.) At the heart of this mea culpa, however, is the idea that the greatest wrong that women have done to men is to assume, like Jack Nicholson's character in A Few Good Men, that guys can't handle the truth. "I apologize…for believing you too weak and fragile to withstand my power and wrath.  For walking on eggshells with you, careful never to bruise your ego, lest you leave me for ‘an easier woman.' I will tell you that at the root of quiet kindness is a rage of everything I believe I cannot tell you."

As Daedone explains, OM doesn't just get women off –- it gives them the tools to ask for what they want in every area of life in every area of life. Women who've been raised to believe that men will run from women's rage discover that in OM, guys develop the skill, the resilience, and the maturity to show up and stay present. "It's made me much more attractive to women," says Blackman. He's not just talking about the digital skills that have made him senior stroker; he's talking about the emotional competence he's developed.

So far in 2012, we've learned that women are now outscoring men on IQ tests. Scientists warn of "the demise of guys" whose boy-brains are addled by porn and video games. And on September 11 (really), Hanna Rosin's The End of Men: And the Rise of Women will hit the shelves.

A hefty percentage of the "masculinity crisis" is media-manufactured alarmism with an anti-feminist agenda. As women have moved into traditionally male spaces, the argument goes, men have begun to feel unneeded, redundant, disposable. Rather than adapt, many guys are disappearing into the online worlds of porn and gaming where they can, at least for a while, feel powerful once more. If we want men to "show up" again, the ladies need to go back to feigning helplessness –- or so the conservative argument goes.

One Taste rejects the notion that women have to shrink (again) to make men feel big. Men can learn not to fear women's sexuality, not by asserting control over it but, as Blackman says, by "learning to dance with it." In the words of one of the year's biggest country hits, the solution to the man malaise may lie in giving guys what they really want: "Something to Do with My Hands." OM is far from the only solution to the current crisis, and for a lot of us, it may be one of the oddest. But for its growing number of devotees, it's surely the most pleasurable.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Sunday, 29 July 2012

Girls Still Sociologically Encouraged To Be With the Band, Not In the Band [Genderal Interest]

Girls Still Sociologically Encouraged To Be With the Band, Not In the BandIt seems that the days of groupies getting traded between rock bands for $50 and a case of beer weren't left to James Cameron's nostalgic film lens. Professor William T. Bielby has examined the sociological roots of rock groupiedom and its continued pervasiveness in a piece entitled Rock in a Hard Place: Grassroots Cultural Production in the Post-Elvis Era.

Girls Still Sociologically Encouraged To Be With the Band, Not In the Band

From the beginning, girls were the primary consumers of amateur rock bands in the 1950s, arguably the golden age of what we now know as rock & roll (although, obviously, more than half of that shit was jacked from black musicians like Chubby Checker and Smokey Robinson).

By and large, white male groups emerged from this period as the mega-stars, likely due to the gendered parenting of that time: boys were given more free reign to hang out unsupervised for jamming and gigs, while girls were kept under a much closer watch lest they get "in trouble." Circa the rise of idols James Dean and Elvis Presley, and it took very few accoutrements for a boy to emulate the alluring teen rebel. Or, as Bielby puts it:

Teenage boys saw Elvis impress the girls, so they got their friends, other teenage boys, to start bands with them.

Even the most famous girl groups of that time, rather than emulating this tactic of eschewing authority themselves, rebelled by falling in love with the male rebels, as evidenced the lyrics of hits like "He's A Rebel" by the Crystals or "Leader of the Pack" by the Shangri-Las.

My folks were always putting him down
They said he came from the wrong side of town
They told me he was bad
But I knew he was sad
That's why I fell for the leader of the pack.

Girls Still Sociologically Encouraged To Be With the Band, Not In the Band

These origins continue to play into the modern consumption of rock music in sublimated, unexpected ways: on T-shirts, in fact, as one shopper noticed in a Toronto H&M. Where were the "I am a drummer shirts"? Oh, in the Ladies' Nowhere section. NBD. Not to mention that this is akin to branding yourself like the musician in question's commodity.

Bielby did note the prevalence of female bassists in alt rock bands, but said that this is the result of a typical gender role mechanism: as the bass became sidelined as a "female" instrument and not considered "men's work" (like, say, drumming or lead guitar), increasingly more room was made for female bassists.

To get the bad taste out of your mouth, here is a delightful live performance by Gilda Radner in the 1970s as female delinquent rocker character Candy Slice. Which, ironically, is still about a man (Mick Jagger). But it's satire!

'"I Fancy The Lead Singer": Bands, Fans and Gender' [The Society Pages]


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.