Showing posts with label College. Show all posts
Showing posts with label College. Show all posts

Friday, 3 August 2012

Christian College Suing Over Birth Control Mandate Didn't Realize it Already Covered Contraception [Pill Baby Pill]

Christian College Suing Over Birth Control Mandate Didn't Realize it Already Covered ContraceptionWheaton College, a private Christian school in Illinois, wishes to be exempt from the Obama administration's newly-enacted birth control insurance mandate, like other religious-run schools and hospitals. But there's one problem: Wheaton doesn't qualify for the exemption, despite the fact that they're adamantly against emergency contraception and birth control and all the unbridled harlotry that proliferates in the presence of the two evil medicines. The reason they don't qualify? Turns out that before all this Obamacare business, the school was already covering emergency contraception. I believe the technical word for what just happened is "Derp."

The Obama administration has offered to make concessions for religious-run schools and hospitals that are morally opposed to covering birth control. Rather than mandating that their sponsored insurance plans start covering 100% of the costs of contraception and sterilization this year, holy rollers have got until August 1st, 2013 to make a plan around how they're going to fit icky, icky whore pills into their employees' health care plans. And even after religious institutions' mandate kicks in, they won't have to cover any of the cost of procedures they find morally objectionable — that will fall on the shoulders of insurance companies. In order for religious-run schools and hospitals to qualify for this so-called "safe haven," they had to verify that their insurance policies didn't cover contraception or sterilization after February 10, 2012.

Should be easy enough, right? If a religious-run institution truly and sincerely believed that birth control pills cause millions of tiny zygote deaths, they'd totally be on the stick about making sure that they weren't helping their group plan enrollees pay for it, right? Again, derp.

The Huffington Post's Laura Bassett reports that Wheaton College, despite its serious, serious opposition to emergency contraception (school leadership's stance is that Plan B causes abortions, which it doesn't, but facts have no place in organized religion), the school "inadvertently" covered emergency contraception after the cutoff date of February 10th, which means they don't qualify for the exemption. And now, even though they're at fault for not taking the necessary precautions, Wheaton's administration finds itself pregnant — with rage.

When Bassett asked a school spokesperson how long emergency contraception coverage existed on Wheaton's plan, they referred her to a legal fund that's supporting the school's lawsuit against the Obama administration. Which means they were probably covering Plan B for a very, very long time. And the entire college didn't implode.

But that hasn't stopped Wheaton's team from playing the persecuted victim in their lawsuit against the law that would require them to provide coverage that they were already providing,

"Everyone knows Wheaton is a school that lives out its faith," Duncan said. "But today our government is telling Wheaton it is not ‘religious enough' to have a conscience, and so can be forced to participate in abortions or face heavy fines. Wheaton has always provided generous employee benefits, but now the government is forcing it to choose between caring for its employees and honoring its faith."

Yes, faith that was so vitally important that it was ignored for God knows how long.

One more time, with feeling: Derp.

[HuffPo]


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Thursday, 2 August 2012

Women's College Dean Says Same-Sex Education Is Better for Businesswomen [Running In Heels]

Women's College Dean Says Same-Sex Education Is Better for Businesswomen65-year-old Cathy E. Minehan, dean of the all-women Simmons College School of Management, a small Boston college which launched the first MBA program designed for women in 1975, says that women have a better chance of succeeding professionally without men around.

In a coed academic environment, "male leadership roles remain unchallenged, and women are left with 'play the game our way, or go home,'" she told the Wall Street Journal.

Before taking over Simmons last summer, Minehan was the chief of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, and spent almost 40 years working in banking in Boston and New York. She said she chose the dean position over retiring because she'd "always had this interest in what you can do, systemically, to make it easier for women to be successful in business."

Minehan is clearly (and rightfully) proud of what Simmons' women have accomplished — "If Harvard wants a case about a woman leader, they usually are looking at stuff we've developed," she said — but her views on same-sex education seem a bit antiquated. "Why is it better to address those systemic issues in an all-women environment when so much of the business world is dominated by men?" the WSJ asked her. "How is that good training for real life?" Here's her response:

Just think about mission-driven education in general-for example, historically black colleges. The schools provide not only a first-class education, but also an environment and culture in which it's easier to talk about some subjects.

[At Simmons, students] can develop tools to navigate better in the business world because they understand the subtleties of a male-dominated culture in a way that they might not understand in classrooms that are dominated by men.

An example: negotiations. Women don't negotiate the same way that men do. We teach classic negotiation theory, classic negotiation practice, but we also teach about the situation women will find in [the outside world] and then how to deal with it.

When (shockingly) asked about Marissa Meyer, Minehan said the whole being pregnant while also CEO thing wasn't such a big deal. "If she's smart enough to run Yahoo, which the board seems to think she is, she's smart enough to figure this out," she said.

We've written at length about how Meyer's refusal to talk about her gender can be frustrating, but the idea that only women should have to learn about "the subtleties of a male-dominated culture" in an academic setting is disheartening in a different way. It's doubtful that "gender-blind" Meyer would ever step foot on Simmons' campus.

Why an All-Female School May Be Best Training Ground [WSJ]

Image via StokketeShutterstock.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.